| [ Home | The Problem | Proposals | How to Help | FAQ | Forum | News | Media | Links | Contact Us | User Services | Logout ] |
Divorce Law discourages marriage
Successful, hard-working people are being actively discouraged
from entering into long term stable relationships.
It discourages reconciliation
Lawyers have an enormous financial incentive to stop
a couple saving their marriage.
It makes the housing shortage much worse
If you have spent years paying off your mortgage you
dare not get married or cohabit in case you lose your house. This situation is
likely to get worse as the Law Commission plan to make this terrible situation
even worse for cohabiting couples
It destroys small firms
The reality of most high value divorces
is that the wealth of one of the parties
has been built up through the creation and ownership of
a company which employs people in order to supply products and
services to the public or other companies. The need for the owner
of such a company to suddenly pay out a large amount of cash
to an ex-spouse can often mean that the company concerned
must be sold, or alternatively that steps must be taken which
mean that its long term future is endangered. In the worst
case companies may cease trading and people lose their jobs
because of the demands of a party who has played no part in
the creation of that wealth.
It removes the Incentive to work hard and become successful
Why bother to work hard and
build up a business if the courts can decide that somebody
else is entitled to half of it?
It is insulting to
people who work hard for a living
The average employee in the UK
would be hard-pushed to earn a total of £1M in a
lifetime of hard work. From this they suffer deduction of
taxes of various kinds. How do you think such people feel
on seeing some undeserving person collect millions in a
divorce?
It is a retrospective
change in a contract
When you got married you entered into a legal contract,
the terms of which have been arbitrarily changed by the
courts. How would you feel if the courts suddenly decided
it would be "fairer" if your employees owned
half your company? Or that your building society owned
half your house?
(OK, so it probably feels that way).
It is contrary to your
human rights
There are a number of grounds for believing
that UK Divorce Law contravenes Human Rights legislation and we believe
that an appeal to the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg would be
successful
It brings the law into
contempt
If you get a leg blown off by a terrorist attack you will
be lucky to collect a few thousand pounds. If you serve 20 years
in prison for a murder that you did not commit, the maximum
compensation that you will get is now limited to
£500,000. Yet somebody who has made no financial contribution
to a marriage or the creation of wealth can collect
millions. What sort of legal system is that?
( Answer: The UK Legal System)
Fairness In Divorce Organisation
You are free to copy and circulate but please give us a link or reference
Site revised on 30th June 2006
| [ Home | The Problem | Proposals | How to Help | FAQ | Forum | News | Media | Links | Contact Us | User Services | Logout ] |